Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-03-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| PLS | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M12's 80 global score. Even though the LG Velvet is older than the Galaxy M12, it's construction is thinner and lighter. The LG Velvet counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet counts with a better looking display than Galaxy M12, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a little bigger display and more pixels per display inch. The LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations and a way higher video quality.
The LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M12, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy M12 counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.