Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| PLS | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M12, with a overall score of 86.2 against 80. The Moto G200 5G body is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy M12, even when both were released only a couple months apart. These phones include Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M12 has Android 10 version.
The Moto G200 5G features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. The Moto G200 5G has a sharper display than Galaxy M12, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a better pixels density and a little bit bigger screen.
Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M12, because it has a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low light situations, a lot higher video quality and a camera with way more megapixels. Galaxy M12 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy M12 counts with superior battery duration than Moto G200 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.