Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| PLS | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is slightly better than the Galaxy M12's general score of 80. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy M12 has Android 10 version. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than Galaxy M12, even when they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better performance than Galaxy M12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 876 x 2142px and a better pixels density.
Motorola razr (2020) has a slightly bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola razr (2020) takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy M12 counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.