Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| PLS | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than the Galaxy M12, with an 80.8 score against 80. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia XR20 has the newer 11 version while Galaxy M12 has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features and enhanced performance. Even being the best we compare here, it must be noted that it is also a a lot heavier and just a little bit thicker phone.
The Nokia XR20 has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Nokia XR20 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy M12, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite larger screen and a better display density.
The Nokia XR20 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and a back camera with a 48 mega pixels, the Nokia XR20 also has better video frame rate and a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Nokia XR20 has a slightly better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy M12 counts with better battery lifetime than Nokia XR20, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4630mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.