Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-03-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| PLS | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Galaxy M12, having an 83.8 score against 80. Even though the Galaxy A50 is much older than the Galaxy M12, it's construction is extremely thinner and extremely lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Galaxy A50 has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M12. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M12, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy M12 features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 50% greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy M12 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M12 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.