Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| PLS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy M12's 80 overall score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M12, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M12 has Android 10.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy M12, because it has a much better pixels amount per inch of display, a quite bigger display and a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M12 features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy M12, because it has a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera, a larger aperture and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.