Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-03-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| PLS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M12, having a overall score of 86.3 against 80. The Galaxy S10e is an much older phone than the Samsung Galaxy M12, but Samsung made it thinner and notably lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy M12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a better looking screen than Galaxy M12, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a lot better amount of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy S10e features a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M12, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10e counts with a camera that's just as good as the Galaxy M12 one, because although the Galaxy S10e has a way less MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better video quality and a lot larger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy M12 counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 94% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.