Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| PLS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is better than Galaxy M12, with a global score of 94.8 against 80. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version while Galaxy M12 has Android 10 version, so it provides you some nice extra features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy S20 is an older device than the Galaxy M12, but Samsung made it notably lighter and thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy M12, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much greater count of pixels per screen inch and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The Galaxy S20 features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy S20 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy M12, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a way better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M12 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.