Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| PLS | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than the Galaxy M12, getting a score of 90.8 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy M12, even though both of them were only released 6 months apart. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while Galaxy M12 has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features and improved performance.
Galaxy S20 FE has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy S20 FE features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M12, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy M12 counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.