Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| PLS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is better than the Galaxy M12's global score of 80. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy M12 has Android 10 version, providing a lot of extra features. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than the Galaxy M12, although it's a little bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy M12, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a quite bigger screen and a lot higher pixel number per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy M12 counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M12, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot higher video quality and a lot better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy M12 counts with longer battery life than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.