Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| PLS | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Galaxy M12, having a score of 81 against 80. The Galaxy XCover Pro is an older and a bit thicker device than the Galaxy M12, but Samsung was able to make it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy M12 has Android 10, offering a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better display than Galaxy M12, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much better screen pixels density. Galaxy M12 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M12 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M12. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. Galaxy M12 has a very superior battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. The Galaxy M12 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.