Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| PLS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Samsung Galaxy M12, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 80. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy M12 has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is lighter and notably thinner than Samsung Galaxy M12, even though it was released just a little over a year before.
Galaxy Z Flip features a better screen than Galaxy M12, because it has a much better pixels count per inch of screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better CPU than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Galaxy M12 count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a back facing camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations.
Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy M12 has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has an 82% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.