Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| PLS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Galaxy M12, with a 92.3 score against 80. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Galaxy M12 were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version while Galaxy M12 has Android 10 version, providing some nice extra features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better looking screen than Galaxy M12, because it has a bit larger display, way more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher 1080 x 2636px resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy M12 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy M12, because although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way less mega pixels back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.