Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-07-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M13's 81.1 overall score. Despite of the fact that the LG Velvet is notably older than the Galaxy M13, it's construction is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner. The Galaxy M13 counts with a bit better processing power than LG Velvet, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy M13 has a slightly better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels, it also counts with a bit better display density. LG Velvet counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy M13, although it has a worse resolution camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Galaxy M13 counts with greater battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.