Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-07-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M13, with an 85.5 score against 81.1. Galaxy A51's construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M13, although it was released many years before. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M13 has Android 12.
The Galaxy M13 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A51. They have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M13 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2408 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M13, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M13 has improved battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M13, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing images and video in low light environments and a lower resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.