Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-07-01 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M13's 81.1 global score. Even though Galaxy S10e is incredibly older than the Samsung Galaxy M13, it's body is incredibly lighter and a little thinner. The Galaxy M13 features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S10e, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a display that's very similar to the display in Galaxy M13, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number per screen inch. Galaxy S10e counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M13, because although it has a back camera with a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture. The Galaxy M13 features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.