Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-07-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is better than the Samsung Galaxy M13, getting a global score of 90.8 against 81.1. The Galaxy S20 FE construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy M13, but it is just a little lighter. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M13 has Android 12 version.
Galaxy M13 features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy M13 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels and a bit larger display.
Galaxy S20 FE has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M13, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy M13, although it has a back facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy M13 features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.