Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-07-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Samsung Galaxy M13, having a global score of 98 against 81.1. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a notably older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy M13. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M13 has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy M13 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has a higher amount of pixels per display inch, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite larger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M13, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better resolution back camera. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M13, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a battery performance that is very similar to Galaxy M13's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.