Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-07-01 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than Galaxy M13, with an 83.3 score against 81.1. The Galaxy S9 body has the same thickness than the Galaxy M13, but it is somewhat lighter. The Galaxy M13 has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S9. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy S9 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M13, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy M13, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos. Galaxy M13 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.