Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-07-01 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy M13's 81.1 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version while Galaxy M13 has Android 12. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is noticeably older, somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than the Galaxy M13.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M13, because although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy M13 features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M13, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy M13 features a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6% bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M13, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.