Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, getting an 85.3 score against 78.9. The iPhone 11 Pro Max design is just a little thinner but somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy M20, and they were released only a couple months apart. The iPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with Android 10 OS.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy M20, because it has a slightly better 1242 x 2688 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a little bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M20 counts with greater battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3969mAh. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.