Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M20, getting a global score of 82 against 78.9. Although iPhone XR and Samsung Galaxy M20 were released with only 3 months difference, iPhone XR's construction is a little thinner but also just a little heavier. IPhone XR features a better performing processor than Galaxy M20, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy M20, although it has a just a little worse pixel density, a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 and a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy M20 has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M20 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Apple iPhone XR shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a bigger camera sensor and a larger camera aperture. Galaxy M20 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.