Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 is just a bit better than the Galaxy M20, with an 81.1 score against 78.9. These phones have Android OS, but the Google Nexus 6 has the older 5.1 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10. The Google Nexus 6 is an a lot older and somewhat thicker cellphone than Galaxy M20, but Google managed to build it just a bit lighter anyway.
Google Nexus 6 has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. Galaxy M20 features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy M20 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Google Nexus 6 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 less cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Nexus 6 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.