Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M20's 78.9 score. Although the Google Pixel is extremely older than Galaxy M20, it's construction is just a little thinner and much lighter. Google Pixel counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each display inch.
Google Pixel counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the Galaxy M20 one, and although the Google Pixel has a lower number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. Galaxy M20 features a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower 12.3 megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photographs.
Galaxy M20 features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.