Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, getting an 82.5 score against 78.9. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is thinner and just a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy M20, even though it was released just 16 months before. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M20. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a back camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments and a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a quite bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M20 has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.