Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a global score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's general score of 78.9. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Galaxy M20 is a heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 3a XL. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M20 has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a display that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy M20's display, although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a little smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy M20 features a much better memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M20 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M20. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3a XL takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a back camera with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.