Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M20's global score of 78.9. The Google Pixel 4 body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy M20, even though both of them were released only 9 months apart. Google Pixel 4 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M20 has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Google Pixel 4 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a less MP back camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture for better photography in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.