Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy M20, with a score of 87.5 against 78.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer phone, and it's also a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M20.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit superior processor than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy M20 has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy M20 features longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.