Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is better than Galaxy M20, having an 89 score against 78.9. The Google Pixel 5 design is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy M20. The Google Pixel 5 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display.
Galaxy M20 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 5 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 features better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh. Google Pixel 5 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography, a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.