Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is a bit better than HTC One M9, having a global score of 78.9 against 77.7. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M20 has the newer 10 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Galaxy M20 is a extremely newer and just a little thinner device than HTC One M9, although it's also somewhat heavier.
HTC One M9 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater screen density. The Galaxy M20 has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The HTC One M9 counts with a faster CPU than Galaxy M20, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit. The HTC One M9 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot higher video resolution.
Galaxy M20 has a superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 76 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.