Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is slightly better than HTC U Ultra, with a 78.9 score against 77. The Galaxy M20 construction is newer, but thicker and a bit heavier than HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra features a processing unit that's very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy M20, and although the HTC U Ultra has a lower number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
HTC U Ultra has a slightly better display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. HTC U Ultra captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a back-facing camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M20 counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.