Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M20's 78.9 overall score. The LG K92 construction is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also just a bit heavier than Galaxy M20. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 10 OS. The LG K92 and Galaxy M20 feature quite similar displays, because although the LG K92 has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger screen.
The LG K92 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M20, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. LG K92 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features improved battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity. The LG K92 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a lot better video resolution, a much more megapixels back-facing camera, a larger aperture and a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.