Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy M20's 78.9 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it counts with some extra features and a performance increase. Although the LG V30S ThinQ is older than the Galaxy M20, it's body is somewhat thinner and lighter.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a more mega pixels back camera, a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M20 counts with a superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.