Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy M20, having a general score of 81.3 against 78.9. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ and Galaxy M20 were released only 8 months apart, the LG V35 ThinQ is thinner and somewhat lighter. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a greater pixels amount in each display inch.
LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M20, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.