Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M20's general score of 78.9. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it offers some additional features and optimized performance. The LG V60 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy M20, but it's somewhat heavier.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little inferior pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The LG V60 ThinQ takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a battery performance that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy M20's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.