Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, with a score of 87.1 against 78.9. The LG Velvet design is newer, just a little lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M20. The LG Velvet has a little better processing power than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite inferior pixels number per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little bigger screen. The LG Velvet shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The LG Velvet features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M20 counts with superior battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.