Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's general score of 78.5. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M20 has 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, the Galaxy M20 construction is much older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M20 has a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.