Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy M20, having a overall score of 80.9 against 78.9. These phones have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 12 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it gives you some additional features and performance optimizations. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's construction is way newer and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy M20's, although it is just a little heavier.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much better display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M20 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much better camera than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a lot larger sensor, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's battery duration is very similar to the Galaxy M20 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.