Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy M20's 78.9 general score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is newer and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy M20's, although it's a little heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, so it offers some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite bigger display.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M20 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.