Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-05 | -- |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), with a general score of 78.9 against 78.9. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M20 has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels in each display inch.
The Galaxy M20 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a much better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot better resolution camera and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy M20 has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.