Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, getting a score of 86.3 against 78.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction has the same weight than Samsung Galaxy M20, but it is just a bit thinner. These phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better looking display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy M20 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy M20 has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a much larger aperture to take better low light photography, a way larger camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos, a much better resolution back facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.