Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M20's 78.9 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is way newer and just a little bit thinner, but also just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy M20. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it provides the user some extra features and optimized performance.
Galaxy M20 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better looking display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a much bigger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality, a way more megapixels camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher video definition.
The Galaxy M20 counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.