Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Power, getting a overall score of 78.9 against 76.1. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M20 has 10 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version. Even though Galaxy M20 is older than Motorola Moto G Power, it's construction is a bit thinner and a little lighter.
The Moto G Power counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M20. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. Moto G Power features a display that is very similar to Galaxy M20's screen, because although the Moto G Power has a quite lower pixel density and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2300px, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with as much memory to store more games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy M20 one, both of them have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power's battery duration is very similar to Samsung Galaxy M20's battery lifetime.
Moto G Power takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low light situations, a way higher video definition, a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.