Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-02-05 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a overall score of 78.9 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy M20 body is a lot newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M20 has older 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Moto Z Force has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better number of pixels per inch of display. Moto Z Force counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M20, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy M20 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Moto Z Force takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.