Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a general score of 78.9 against 77.4. The Galaxy M20 body is newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it is notably thicker and incredibly heavier. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M20. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.