Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M20 has the previous 10 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even being the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy M20 is a heavier and a lot thicker cellphone than Moto Z3.
The Moto Z3 counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Moto Z3 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy M20, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit less pixels per inch of display and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos and a less mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Moto Z3 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M20, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z3 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M20 features a much better battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.