Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a somewhat heavier and notably thicker device than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a CPU that is very similar to the Galaxy M20 one, they have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Moto Z3 Play features a display that's very similar to the screen in Galaxy M20, although the Moto Z3 Play has a little worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, a quite smaller display and a quite worse pixels amount in each inch of display. The Moto Z3 Play has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z3 Play also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M20 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 67% bigger battery size. Moto Z3 Play counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.