Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 overall score. The Galaxy M20 design is just a little heavier but a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Action, and both were released only a few months apart. The Motorola One Action has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola One Action also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a bit greater pixel density.
The Motorola One Action counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M20. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola One Action counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One Action shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low light environments and a lot higher (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a much longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.