Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is much better than the Galaxy M20's score of 78.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version and Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is just a little bit heavier than Galaxy M20, it's thinner and newer.
The Motorola razr (2020) features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a slightly better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little better amount of pixels in each display inch, a little larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera, a lot better video definition, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with more storage for apps and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy M20 has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.