Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 15 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 409 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M20's global score of 78.9. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s design is extremely newer and way thinner than Galaxy M20's, although it's also a little heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a newer 15 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, counting with some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy M20 has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy M20 counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4700mAh. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a larger aperture, a way more mega pixels back camera and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.